Critical Psychology and freedom Term Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

Critical Psychology and granting immunity - Term Paper ExampleFreedom performer being out of external coercion from all aspects of life. In most cases this coercion comes from the government. Globalization has been brought round by item-by-items desire to live better and to be scanty. The importance of a globalized arena is the mobility associated with it across the world. The hear attraction to globalization is exemption as suggested by Micklethwait and Wooldridge (2000). The nature of globalization overcomes the barriers associated with where to invest, what to buy or where to go thus giving case-by-cases the chance to make choice. This freedom associated with globalization is in terms of social, governmental and stinting freedom. In the case of political freedom, globalization provides for the best opportunities good governance and democracies. Globalization brings economic freedom in terms of free market competition for goods and services. Social freedom means that indiv iduals are free to move to all parts of world and interact freely without any kind of restriction. However some(prenominal) scholars According to Nikolas Rose, Freedom and its value is becoming principle of most of the political endeavor and projects. The free world where the individuals dwell is triumphed with free market economy brought about by globalization according to Rudnycky (2010). The aspect of freedom according to Nikolas Rose underpins individuals perception of how they want to be organized, ruled and understood in respect to their predicament. In the past, freedom in all spects of life was seen to eradicate social stability, order and morals of work, civility and the value of the family. Today with the growth of globalization, freedom is valued as it brings about social mobility. Individuals welcome desired to be free and are always on the motive of getting liberation. However political freedom appears to be paradoxical and is almost theoretical rather than practical . According to Rose, this is because the world today is characterized by the opposition existing between freedom and government. As suggested by Baum (2000), the value of current politics has been be by the value of liberalism. A allege which is liberal is limited in that the practices of the government are curb by individual liberty. With the issue of globalization freedom is understood as practical, material, governmental and technical. The principle of individual freedom is only moral aspect which has led to growing and advanced civilization. Protecting and enhancing citizens freedom secures the states wealth, productivity, health and its welfare. Nikolas Rose argues that freedom has been the governments objective. It is also perceived as governments instrument and means of promoting the interposition of various governing technologies. According to Zygmunt Bauman, Freedom refers to a situation whereby the motives of the individual shape their actions and the desired results of the outcome. respectable like Rose, Bauman is against the idea that freedom existing universally. Bauman argues that freedom in the modern world is constructed as a social creation and capitalism development resulting from privileges and power. In his discussion on the concept of freedom Bauman uses common chord different themes as suggested by Oksala (2005). One of these themes is relational concept freedom which implies that freedom to one individual is lack of freedom t anther individual. Secondly is the issue of the influence capitalism has on modern freedoms. Finally, he underscores the idea of government