Finding True Compassion Essay

In hu patch conjunction, man is surrounded by those little privileged, those in a state of desperation. In her piece On compassion, Barbara Ascher describes brief scenes that capture the basis of trans mo handstion between the helpless and those in a position to give help, arguing that the provided way society tin achieve true compassion is by truly identifying with the anguish of opposites. Ascher observes the world around her as a member of society, describing encounters between those in a place of misery and those in normal walks of life.As she observes the smiling man on the street corner and the old man who smelled of cigarettes and urine, she distinguishes herself from her fellow human cosmoss. Ascher notices these people, while others look away and daydream a bit, making her stand out as someone who atomic number 50 acknowledge and understand those in times of hardship. Because Ascher writes as someone who can identify with adversity, she succeeds in persuading socie ty as a whole to tweet compassion through understanding. Ascher draws a strict line between those low-down and those privileged in her piece to specifically isolate her audience.At the very beginning of her essay, Ascher describes a group of pedestrians assembled at a street corner, role on ignoring the haggard homeless man before them. A man lifts and lowers the shiny toe of his right shoe, watching the light reflect doing anything to deflect confronting the grinning man in any way. Later in her piece, Ascher describes ladies in high-heeled shoes and how they pick their way through poverty and madness, hoping to come off the torment experienced by those around them.Ascher accuses these people as being the flawed majority of a compassionless society, exposing how they actively attempt to ignore and impact past the living adversity that walks the streets around them. The troublesome presence is take from the awareness of the electorate, but Ascher tries to persuade these peop le to do the exact opponent by letting in the hardship they also grow to labour compassion. Ascher describes scenarios in which she questions whether or not acts of compassion are simply facades that hold back misguided motives.The woman who protects herself and her child by bearing the dollar ilk a cross obviously acts out of fear, attempting to ward off the unwished-for presence of the homeless man. Ascher uses rhetorical questions to challenge the womans motives, communicate was it fear or compassion that motivated the gift? Ascher also questions the motives of the coffee tree shop owner, asking if pity, care or compassion compelled her decision to dedicate the homeless man day after day. Ascher takes up an extremely accusatory tone, directly exposing the mayor of New York Citys misguided motives coffin nail the involuntary hospitalization of the homeless in his city.Ascher questions the grounds upon which these people act to enforce her argument that humanity must lea rn to identify with the rags with voices to sour truly compassionate. Ascher exposes the flaws in societys acts of compassion, reminding everyday men and women that their tendency to fear and distance themselves from the helpless only proves to hinder their energy for compassion. As people walk through the Greek tragedy that is life, the only way to truly brighten the stage is to embrace the darkness that afflicts other players, hoping to shed the pure light of compassion.