Rene Descartes is a Rationalist :: Rationalism vs Empiricism

There is a distinct difference between rationalism and empiricism. In fact, they be in truth plainly the direct opposite of each other. Rationalism is the belief in immanent ideas, reason, and deduction. Empiricism is the belief in sense perception, induction, and that there are no innate ideas.With rationalism, believing in innate ideas means to let ideas before we are born.-for example, through reincarnation. Plato best explains this through his theory of the forms, which is the authority where everyone goes and attains knowledge before they are taken back to the visible creative activity. Innate ideas can explain why some mass are just naturally better at some things than other people are- even if they check had the same experiences.Believing that reason is the main germ of knowledge is another clear distinction of rationalism. Rationalists see that the 5 senses only give you opinions, not reasons. For example, in Descartes wax contention, he explains how a standard c andle has one shape to begin with- but once the candle is lit, it begins to melt, fall a focal point its fragrance, and take on a completely different shape than it had started with. This argument proves that our senses can be deceiving and that they should not be trusted.Deduction is the third feature of speech of rationalism, which is to prove something with certainty rather than reason. For example, Descartes attempted to prove the existence of matinee idol through deductive reasoning in his third meditation. It went something desire this I have an idea of a perfect substance, but I am not a perfect substance, so there is no way I could not be the cause of this idea, so there essential be some formal reality which is a perfect substance- wish well God. Because only perfection can create perfection, and though it can to a fault create imperfection- nothing that is imperfect can create something that is perfect.Unlike rationalists, empiricists believe that sense perception is the main source of knowledge. John Locke explained this by dividing ideas into 2 parts 1) simple, and 2) complex. Simple ideas are based only on perception, like color, size, shape, etc. Complex ideas are formed when simple ideas are combined. some other belief of empiricists is that ideas are only acquired through experience, and not through innate ideas. Empiricists reject the concept of innate knowledge because, for example, if children had this knowledge, why do they not show it? Like why does a baby need to visualize to walk or talk, why does he or she not have this knowledge at birth?